Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sensitivity analysis after -teffects ipwra-?

    Hi,

    I'm using Stata 14 and have modeled the effect of a treatment on an outcome using the -teffects- command. In particular I'm using the inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment (ipwra) option. What I'd like to know is if there's a way to conduct a sensitivity analysis after running my model?

    For more context, here is my code:

    teffects ipwra (eng1score1516 c_readscore1415 black hispanic asian othrace male agecentered disadvantaged yesatrisk yeslep yesspecial yesmagnet yesgifted yeshomeless black29pct econ73pct atrisk62pct cad_gap cad_progress cad_post cad_read cpemallp ir_school) (treat black hispanic asian othrace male disadvantaged black29pct ir_school agecentered), vce(robust) ate

    Iteration 0: EE criterion = 1.056e-18
    Iteration 1: EE criterion = 2.299e-25

    Treatment-effects estimation Number of obs = 10,347
    Estimator : IPW regression adjustment
    Outcome model : linear
    Treatment model: logit

    Robust
    eng1score1516 Coef. Std. Err. z P>z [95% Conf. Interval]

    ATE
    treat
    (1 vs 0) 58.09149 11.23186 5.17 0.000 36.07744 80.10554

    POmean
    treat
    0 3931.306 6.129642 641.36 0.000 3919.292 3943.32



  • #2
    I would like to push this unresolved question up. If there is a multivalued treatment, how can we conduct sensitivity analysis? Looking for ados like regsensitivity, psacalc, sensatt, or sensemakr. These all work only with binary treatments.
    Last edited by Felix Bittmann; 02 Aug 2025, 03:16.
    Best wishes

    Stata 18.0 MP | ORCID | Google Scholar

    Comment


    • #3
      Felix: I would think the main effects of interest are ATE(g) or ATET(g), where g is the treatment level. These are with respect to the control state, so Y(g) - Y(0). IPWRA is the same as a bunch of binary treatment comparisons, comparing g with 0. So I think you can apply the tools for binary treatments. It’s a bit clumsy, I suppose.

      Comment

      Working...
      X