This is less of a technical question and more statistics in general. I tried to find information about this on the internet but I believe that I don't have the wording right in order to find what I'm looking for.
I received a dataset from a researcher and he works with main dimensions and sub dimensions. It looks as follows:

He calculated Cronbach alpha's for the sub-dimensions and, since they were above his cutoff value of 0.67, both sub-dimensions received a single variable by combining the question scores through the use of
He then used these two sub dimension variables to calculate a new Cronbach alpha for the main dimension. In other words, he calculated a Cronbach alpha over two variables that were already combined variables.
My question is, did he do the right thing? In my eyes, by "stacking" these alpha's, the internal consistency is reduced further then reflected in the second Alpha and you are therefore not allowed to do it. However, this data comes from an official research agency and I would assume that they are doing it right.
I received a dataset from a researcher and he works with main dimensions and sub dimensions. It looks as follows:
He calculated Cronbach alpha's for the sub-dimensions and, since they were above his cutoff value of 0.67, both sub-dimensions received a single variable by combining the question scores through the use of
Code:
egen sub_dimension1 = rowmean(Question1 Question2)
My question is, did he do the right thing? In my eyes, by "stacking" these alpha's, the internal consistency is reduced further then reflected in the second Alpha and you are therefore not allowed to do it. However, this data comes from an official research agency and I would assume that they are doing it right.
Comment