Hi!
We are writing a thesis about the relation between CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) and Return on Assets and are performing regression analysis in STATA to be able to analyze the results.
Return on Assets is computed by multiplying the firm's Profit Margin with Asset Turnover and CSR is measured using an index over the years 2006-2014.
When performing a regression on CSR effect on Return on Assets, we get the results that higher CSR score has a negative effect on Return on Assets. But when performing a regression analysis on both the components (Profit Margin & Asset Turnover) we see that a CSR has a positive effect on both the components. This seems strange to us, as intuitively CSR effect on Return on Asset should have the same "sign" as CSR effect on the two components used to compute Return on Assets.
So our question is: does anyone know if this is even possible? Or if it's wrong? And if it is possible, how it is best explained? We have attached snapshots of our first regressions showing a negative sign between CSR and Return on Assets, but positive signs on Profit Margin and Asset Turnover.
We are writing a thesis about the relation between CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) and Return on Assets and are performing regression analysis in STATA to be able to analyze the results.
Return on Assets is computed by multiplying the firm's Profit Margin with Asset Turnover and CSR is measured using an index over the years 2006-2014.
When performing a regression on CSR effect on Return on Assets, we get the results that higher CSR score has a negative effect on Return on Assets. But when performing a regression analysis on both the components (Profit Margin & Asset Turnover) we see that a CSR has a positive effect on both the components. This seems strange to us, as intuitively CSR effect on Return on Asset should have the same "sign" as CSR effect on the two components used to compute Return on Assets.
So our question is: does anyone know if this is even possible? Or if it's wrong? And if it is possible, how it is best explained? We have attached snapshots of our first regressions showing a negative sign between CSR and Return on Assets, but positive signs on Profit Margin and Asset Turnover.
Comment