Hi folks,
Over the last number of weeks I've been creating a custom dataset. In short, I have geocoded sports capital grants by the Irish government. I have also merged this data with small area statistics from the 2011 census in order to have an idea of the regional characteristics of where these clubs are based.
A lot has been examined in regards to the political bias of the distribution of these grants, with regions in which the finance and minister of sport are based doing particularly well. I'm adding to the literature by looking at other potential actors who can perhaps manipulate the system, namely heads of key sporting organisations within Ireland.
I utilise two dependent variables, namely the difference between the amount of money a club applied for, and the grant which they were awarded (as a per cent). The second dependent variable is the amount which a club received for a grant.
For my political bias measure I use the distance in km between the hometown of a minister/head of a sporting organisation to a club.
All my variables are in logarithmic form. I also utilised the augmented dickey fuller test finding no evidence of variables having a unit root. My ministerial variables are in line with what past studies have found also, leading me to believe that my data is sound. One of my issues is that in some cases, I reduce the sample to take into account extremely large grants awarded and also focus on particular sports, my constant is insignificant.
My P>F is significant though with it reading 0.000 in nearly all cases. I include dummies to take into account differences in sports, along with year dummies too.
I'm wondering is it acceptable to present results which have an insignificant constant and a large standard error?
Also would anyone recommend any other robustness tests to carry out, to ensure robust results.
Kind regards,
Sean
Over the last number of weeks I've been creating a custom dataset. In short, I have geocoded sports capital grants by the Irish government. I have also merged this data with small area statistics from the 2011 census in order to have an idea of the regional characteristics of where these clubs are based.
A lot has been examined in regards to the political bias of the distribution of these grants, with regions in which the finance and minister of sport are based doing particularly well. I'm adding to the literature by looking at other potential actors who can perhaps manipulate the system, namely heads of key sporting organisations within Ireland.
I utilise two dependent variables, namely the difference between the amount of money a club applied for, and the grant which they were awarded (as a per cent). The second dependent variable is the amount which a club received for a grant.
For my political bias measure I use the distance in km between the hometown of a minister/head of a sporting organisation to a club.
All my variables are in logarithmic form. I also utilised the augmented dickey fuller test finding no evidence of variables having a unit root. My ministerial variables are in line with what past studies have found also, leading me to believe that my data is sound. One of my issues is that in some cases, I reduce the sample to take into account extremely large grants awarded and also focus on particular sports, my constant is insignificant.
My P>F is significant though with it reading 0.000 in nearly all cases. I include dummies to take into account differences in sports, along with year dummies too.
I'm wondering is it acceptable to present results which have an insignificant constant and a large standard error?
Also would anyone recommend any other robustness tests to carry out, to ensure robust results.
Kind regards,
Sean
Comment