Quaids commands: nlsuraids returned 199, verify that nlsuraids13 is a function evaluator program

[Guest]

Dear Colleagues ,

I am trying to estimate a 7 goods QUAIDS model with 5 household demographics characteristics. I am getting this error message: nlsuraids13 returned 199
verify that nlsuraids13 is a function evaluator program


Here is codes:

#delimit;
program nlsurquaids13;
version 13.1;
syntax varlist(min=20 max=20) if, at(name);
tokenize `varlist';
args w1 w2 w3 w4 w5 w6 w7 wp1 wp2 wp3 wp4 wp5 wp6 wp7 lnexp x1 x2 x3 x4 x5;


nlsur nlsurquaids13 @ w1 w2 w3 w4 w5 w6 w7 wp1 wp1 wp2 wp3 wp4 wp5 wp6 wp7 lnexp x1 x2 x3 x4 x5, ifgnls neq(7) parameters(a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 g11 g12 g13 g14 g15 g16 g17 g22 g23 g24 g25 g26 g27 g33 g34 g35 g36 g37 g44 g45 g46 g47 g55 g56 g57 g66 g67 g77 l1 l2 l3 l4 l5 l6 l7 r11 r12 r13 r14 r15 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r31 r32 r33 r34 r35 r36 r37 r41 r42 r43 r44 r45 r46 r47 r51 r52 r53 r54 r55 r61 r62 r63 r64 r65 r71 r72 r73 r74 r75) nolog;

Need your help as soon as possible,

Thank you

[William Lisowski]

You have two different posts outstanding on the same topic: your problems getting nlsur to run. What the posts have in common is incomplete or incorrectly copied diagnostic information.

Please review the Statalist FAQ linked to from the top of the page, as well as from the Advice on Posting link on the page you used to create your post. See especially sections 9-12 on how to best pose your question. It's particularly helpful to copy commands and output from your Stata Results window and paste them into your Statalist post using CODE delimiters, as described in section 12 of the FAQ.

In this post, you show us code to create the program nlsurquaids13 and code that runs nlsur using nlsurquaids13, but you show us an error message about nlsuraids13 and the title of your post refers to nlsuraids13.

In your other post you present the error message

nlsurnlsurquaidsNPS@ returned 199

(copied from your post, which did not use CODE delimiters, and pasted here using CODE delimiters to clarify what you posted) and when it is suggested that you need to leave a space before and after the @ you respond that there is one, which is not what you presented.

http://www.statalist.org/forums/foru...st-not-allowed