I have come across an issue that I can't find any clear directions about. I have a Dataset where we have two respondents per firm filling out the same survey on their perception of firm performance, competitive advantage and other perceptual variables. It seems to me that there are two possibilities the analysis (OLS).
1. Use an average of the two responses to bring the data back to a firm level.
2. Cluster the standard errors on a firm level and thus have twice the amount of observations.
It seems prior research that I can find usually has gone with the first option (but they are citing people from the 70s and 80s to justify this, and these original papers have not justified it from a stats point of view). So can anybody with greater knowledge than me help shed light on this issue from a stats point of view?
1. Use an average of the two responses to bring the data back to a firm level.
2. Cluster the standard errors on a firm level and thus have twice the amount of observations.
It seems prior research that I can find usually has gone with the first option (but they are citing people from the 70s and 80s to justify this, and these original papers have not justified it from a stats point of view). So can anybody with greater knowledge than me help shed light on this issue from a stats point of view?
Comment