Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Marginal effects after bivariate probit, using CMP with random effects

    Dear all

    I analyses the child’s probability to work and go to school.
    One important explanatory variable is income, which is endogenous. To correct for this I use an instrument. My baseline model therefore look like this:

    y*1i = β1x1i + β2x2i + β3y3i1i y1i=1 if y*1i > 0, otherwise 0
    y*2i = β3x1i + β4x2i + β3y3i + ε2i y2i=1 if y*2i > 0, otherwise 0
    y3i = β3x1i + β4x2i + β5x5i3i

    I estimate my model using the CMP program (Roodman 2011)::
    cmp (exp = x1 x2 x3 inst) (work = exp x1 x2 x3) (school = exp x1 x2 x3) if age>5 & age<15, cluster(district) ind($cmp_cont $cmp_probit $cmp_probit)

    After this I estimate the marginal effects, by using :
    margins, predict(pr eq(#2)) dydx(*) force

    However, now I want to include random effects at household and district level, changing my model into:

    cmp (exp = x1 x2 x3 inst ||district: || hhold (work = exp x1 x2 x3 ||district: || hhold (school = exp x1 x2 x3 ||district: || hhold if age>5 & age<15, cluster(district) ind($cmp_cont $cmp_probit $cmp_probit)


    My question is: How do I estimate the marginal effects after this model?


    Thankfull for any help!

    //Elin Vimefall


    Ref
    Roodman D. (2011). Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. The Stata Journal 2011, 11(2), pp 159-206.

  • #2
    I'm sorry for the smiling faces, it should be : after hhold and then ).

    Comment

    Working...
    X