Hello together,
for a bachelor thesis I am trying to analyze the effect of entrepreneurial education on economic growth. For this I wanted to use a GMM model with the xtabond2 command.
My dependent variable: ln(GDPperCapita)
explanatory variable: BasicSchoolEntrepreneurialEducation, PostSchoolEntrepreneurialEducation
control variables: R&D_Expenditure, GrossCapitalFormation, Unemployment, GovernmentExpenditure, PopulationGrowth.
Im trying to analyze developed and underdeveloped countries separated and I have a problem for the model for the underdeveloped countries.
My command is the following:
I was testing to reduce the p-values of my variable and of the Hansen test by changing the laglimit, but unfortunately my results are still insignificant:
Can someone help me to adapt my command, so my variables get significant and the Hansen-test gets lower as well.
Many thanks in advance
for a bachelor thesis I am trying to analyze the effect of entrepreneurial education on economic growth. For this I wanted to use a GMM model with the xtabond2 command.
My dependent variable: ln(GDPperCapita)
explanatory variable: BasicSchoolEntrepreneurialEducation, PostSchoolEntrepreneurialEducation
control variables: R&D_Expenditure, GrossCapitalFormation, Unemployment, GovernmentExpenditure, PopulationGrowth.
Im trying to analyze developed and underdeveloped countries separated and I have a problem for the model for the underdeveloped countries.
My command is the following:
Code:
xtabond2 lnGDPperCapita L.lnGDPperCapita Basicschoolentrepreneurialedu Postschoolentrepreneurialeduc R_D GrossCapital Unemploymenttotaloftotal Government Populationgrowthannual, gmm(L.lnGDPperCapita,laglimit(1 1) collapse) iv(Basicschoolentrepreneurialedu Postschoolentrepreneurialeduc R_D GrossCapital Unemploymenttotaloftotal Government Populationgrowthannual) nodiffsargan twostep orthogonal small robust
Can someone help me to adapt my command, so my variables get significant and the Hansen-test gets lower as well.
Many thanks in advance