I've finally had a chance to use Stata 17 tables and collections features in earnest. They are really amazing, and I appreciated a comment from a recent Stata free webinar on Tables, where the speaker said Tables in Stata 17 are an advance over competitive offerings. I'd have to agree.
One of the issues I now have to keep in mind is that sometimes I want collections and tables, and sometimes resultssets (datasets of results), and sometimes I want both. I often use xsvmat (Roger Newson) to save resultssets, for example like this
At issue for me now is finding the best balance of creating resultssets (datasets) and collections (tables) such that I don't have two work streams. Roger or anyone else that uses Roger's tools, do you feel you have resultssets and collections/tables integrated?
Thanks for any thoughts.
One of the issues I now have to keep in mind is that sometimes I want collections and tables, and sometimes resultssets (datasets of results), and sometimes I want both. I often use xsvmat (Roger Newson) to save resultssets, for example like this
Code:
regress ...
contrast r.tx, pveffects nowald mcompare(bonf)
xsvmat, from(r(table)') frame(m1, replace) names(col) rownames(contrast) ///
idstr("m1")
Thanks for any thoughts.
