For my master thesis I am running a time series pannel regression of the total ESG score of russel 3000 firms on the compensation of their CEO, controlling for a few different variables.
This results in the following regression eqauation:
Total_Comp i,t = α + β1 Tot_Scr i,t + β2 Contoli,t+ µt + ait + Ɛ i,t,
After running a regression in stata with (1) without time fixed effects and (2) with time fixed effects i get the following results (full stata results added as picture)
(1) xtreg $ylist1 $xlist1, fe
(2) xtreg $ylist1 $xlist1 i.year, fe
The sign of the total score completely changes after adding Time fixed effects. I am having trouble interpretating the economic implications of the difference between the two coefficients after adding the time fixed effect.
At first a 1point increase in score, ceteris paribus, results in a 20K expected increase in CEO salary, whilst after time fixed effects a 1 point increase in score, ceteris paribus, results in a 30K expected decrease in CEO salary.
How can this difference be interpreted?
Thank you in advance for your help, Kind Regards,
Geert Smits
This results in the following regression eqauation:
Total_Comp i,t = α + β1 Tot_Scr i,t + β2 Contoli,t+ µt + ait + Ɛ i,t,
After running a regression in stata with (1) without time fixed effects and (2) with time fixed effects i get the following results (full stata results added as picture)
(1) xtreg $ylist1 $xlist1, fe
(2) xtreg $ylist1 $xlist1 i.year, fe
| (1) | (2) | ||
| Tot_Comm | Tot_Comm | ||
| Tot_Scr | 20.041** | -30.004*** | |
| 2.31 | -3.05 | ||
| Comp_Comm | 228.27 | 1346.25* | |
| 0.29 | 1.72 | ||
| CSR_Comm | 1520.59*** | 780.33*** | |
| 5.28 | 2.58 | ||
| Sales_Growth | 2.788 | 1.190 | |
| 0.89 | 0.37 | ||
| ROA | 48.366*** | 44.001*** | |
| 4.30 | 3.91 | ||
| Size | 23.287*** | 15.663*** | |
| 6.00 | 4.00 | ||
| Lev | 6.708 | 0.394 | |
| 1.25 | 0.07 | ||
| Owner | 92.732** | 146.69*** | |
| 2.15 | 3.40 | ||
| _cons | 5090.13*** | 4815.59*** | |
| 5.78 | 5.22 | ||
| Firm fixed effects | Yes | Yes | |
| Time fixed effects | No | Yes | |
| R-squared | 0.058 | 0.020 | |
| F-test | 15.42*** | 15.65*** |
The sign of the total score completely changes after adding Time fixed effects. I am having trouble interpretating the economic implications of the difference between the two coefficients after adding the time fixed effect.
At first a 1point increase in score, ceteris paribus, results in a 20K expected increase in CEO salary, whilst after time fixed effects a 1 point increase in score, ceteris paribus, results in a 30K expected decrease in CEO salary.
How can this difference be interpreted?
Thank you in advance for your help, Kind Regards,
Geert Smits

Comment