I often use Stata to create and save graphs. I typically save the *.gph version, and then export to *.emf and *.pdf formats as well. Today, my emf and pdf files don't look exactly like the *.gph versions. The series looks right, but "too many" recessions are showing. Any ideas on why the pdf and emf files are not "exact copies" of the gph version?

Sample code is here: bgshade stata_qtr,
twoway
(
tsline ECOMPCTSA if year>=1999,
lwidth(medthick)
ytitle("")
ylabel(,angle(0) labsize(small))
xtitle("")
xlabel(, labsize(small))
title("`title1'")
subtitle("`title2'")
note("`note1'" "`note2'" "`note3'")
legend(off)
||
scatter ECOMPCTSA stata_qtr if stata_qtr==tq(`lastqtr_A'),
msize(vsmall) mlabel(ECOMPCTSA) mcolor(navy) mlabcolor(navy)
saving(ecommerce1.gph, replace)
)
shaders(NBERQ);
graph export ecommerce1.pdf, replace;
graph export ecommerce1.emf, replace;
gph file: ecommerce1.gph
pdf file: ecommerce1.pdf
Sample code is here: bgshade stata_qtr,
twoway
(
tsline ECOMPCTSA if year>=1999,
lwidth(medthick)
ytitle("")
ylabel(,angle(0) labsize(small))
xtitle("")
xlabel(, labsize(small))
title("`title1'")
subtitle("`title2'")
note("`note1'" "`note2'" "`note3'")
legend(off)
||
scatter ECOMPCTSA stata_qtr if stata_qtr==tq(`lastqtr_A'),
msize(vsmall) mlabel(ECOMPCTSA) mcolor(navy) mlabcolor(navy)
saving(ecommerce1.gph, replace)
)
shaders(NBERQ);
graph export ecommerce1.pdf, replace;
graph export ecommerce1.emf, replace;
gph file: ecommerce1.gph
pdf file: ecommerce1.pdf

Comment