Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bruce Weaver
    replied
    Jeff Grogger, re your second example in #689, it seems to me that -more- as a prefix command might be more consistent with other Stata commands. E.g.,

    Code:
    more: reg y treatment x1-x475, robust

    Leave a comment:


  • Clyde Schechter
    replied
    #690 gives a solution that works for linear regression on panel data. More generally, you can run your estimation command -quietly- and store the estimates (-estimates store-). Then use -etable- (or the older -esttab- or -estout-) and apply its -keep()- option to show only the coefficients you are interested in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Grogger
    replied
    Maarten Buis The controls need not be dummies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Maarten Buis
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Grogger View Post
    [USER="92"]The idea was that I might be interested in the coefficient on "treatment," but not the 475 control variables x1-x475, so it would be nice to be able to view just the first screen of results from reg and then escape out.
    Isn't that what areg is for?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Grogger
    replied
    Rich Goldstein I guess what I was looking for was something more unix-like, along the lines of
    Code:
    . ls somedir > more
    where you could "more" a command on the fly. In my admittedly cryptic example,
    Code:
    reg y treatment x1-x475,robust more
    I imagined the more option playing the role of piping to more under unix. The idea was that I might be interested in the coefficient on "treatment," but not the 475 control variables x1-x475, so it would be nice to be able to view just the first screen of results from reg and then escape out. The more option would provide a little more flexibility than
    Code:
    set more on

    Leave a comment:


  • Rich Goldstein
    replied
    Jeff Grogger - are you looking for something more than the actual more command does? if so, what? see
    Code:
    help more
    and, yes, I realize you asked for an option but why?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Grogger
    replied
    How about a --more-- option, so you can run a command, but then only look at the first few lines of the results? E.g.,
    reg y treatment x1-x475,robust more

    Leave a comment:


  • Clyde Schechter
    replied
    Re: #685. What are you looking for that cannot be achieved with -export excel- or -putexcel-?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Vecchio
    replied
    Not sure if this was posted already, but the ability to directly create and format Excel charts from Stata would be very helpful. I currently process the data using Stata, then use Python to call the win32 COM interface to create the charts. Built-in functionality would be amazing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Weinberg
    replied
    Two minor asks:
    1) with frames, I’d like to be able to create a new frame and switch to it in one line

    2) with the new tables, it looks like table titles have to be only one line? I’d like to be able to use the same sort of titles I can do with graphs, where I enter multiple sets of quotes and it puts them on different lines.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Murphy
    replied
    RE: #669

    Clyde I apparently missed the announcement on collect table in v17- thanks, excited to try it out!

    Leave a comment:


  • Christopher Bratt
    replied
    Maybe you recall the series of Easter eggs dropped in anticipation of Stata 17
    It’s a well-known marketing trick. They got us talking and eager to see what’s behind the curtain.

    Anyone buying Stata now will have one year of free upgrades, but now I’d probably postpone before buying. I would want to know what’s coming. So I don’t think sales from this week to the next are improved by the teaser.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clyde Schechter
    replied
    I think they're treading a fine line. They want to gin up excitement over the coming of Stata 18. But if they outright declare it's coming, their sales of Stata 17 between now and release date will tank.

    Leave a comment:


  • Leonardo Guizzetti
    replied
    Originally posted by Jared Greathouse View Post
    When they emailed this to us, I was like "Why don't they just say Stata 18 drops next week🤣" no need to dance around it
    Maybe you recall the series of Easter eggs dropped in anticipation of Stata 17? I’m sure the Marketing group likes to have fun with these things.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jared Greathouse
    replied
    When they emailed this to us, I was like "Why don't they just say Stata 18 drops next week🤣" no need to dance around it

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X