Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Wow,your answers are very helpful for me to understand GMM methods and your command xtdpdgmm.This command has been tweeted and speaded in China.
    Best regards.

    Raymond Zhang
    Stata 17.0,MP

    Comment


    • #17
      sebastian Dear Pro Sebastian,
      you said sys-GMM should holds the additional mean-stationarity assumption.I want to know how to test this mean-stationarity assumption.What Stata command can i use to test it?

      Raymond
      Best regards.

      Raymond Zhang
      Stata 17.0,MP

      Comment


      • #18
        You can test the additional instruments for the level model with a difference-in-Hansen test (aka incremental Hansen test). See slides 48 to 52 of my 2019 London Stata Conference presentation.

        Notice that the reliability of this test requires that the diff-GMM estimator is properly identified because this is essentially a test whether the sys-GMM estimator differs systematically from the diff-GMM estimator.
        https://www.kripfganz.de/stata/

        Comment


        • #19
          So if the incremental overidentification test rejects the validity of the additional moment conditions for the level model, should I use diff-GMM? do you mean if Incremental overidentification test's p-value is larger than 5%,I should choose sys-GMM?



          Best regards.

          Raymond Zhang
          Stata 17.0,MP

          Comment


          • #20
            Sebastian Kripfganz
            Best regards.

            Raymond Zhang
            Stata 17.0,MP

            Comment


            • #21
              In a nutshell, yes. Although you need to check the reliability of the diff-GMM estimator first, i.e. initially use the underidentification tests and the Hansen overidentification test for the diff-GMM estimator. If the Hansen test for diff-GMM fails, then the incremental Hansen test for the sys-GMM estimator is not valid.
              https://www.kripfganz.de/stata/

              Comment


              • #22
                So can I do like this?
                Step 1:do underidentification tests and the Hansen overidentification test for the diff-GMM estimator.
                Step 2:if the Hansen overidentification test p-value>0.05,we can do the incremental Hansen test for the sys-GMM estimator .
                Step 3:If the incremental Hansen test p-value<0.05,we should use Diff-GMM.If the incremental Hansen test p-value>0.05,we should use sys-GMM.

                In Step 2,if the Hansen overidentification test p-value<0.05,does it mean both Diff-GMM and sys-GMM are invalid?
                Best regards.

                Raymond Zhang
                Stata 17.0,MP

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Raymond Zhang View Post
                  So can I do like this?
                  Step 1:do underidentification tests and the Hansen overidentification test for the diff-GMM estimator.
                  Step 2:if the Hansen overidentification test p-value>0.05,we can do the incremental Hansen test for the sys-GMM estimator .
                  Step 3:If the incremental Hansen test p-value<0.05,we should use Diff-GMM.If the incremental Hansen test p-value>0.05,we should use sys-GMM.
                  Basically yes.

                  Originally posted by Raymond Zhang View Post
                  In Step 2,if the Hansen overidentification test p-value<0.05,does it mean both Diff-GMM and sys-GMM are invalid?
                  Yes.
                  https://www.kripfganz.de/stata/

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Great!I have leraned so much!Thank you for your time!
                    Best regards.

                    Raymond Zhang
                    Stata 17.0,MP

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X