Hi all,
I hope this finds you well!
As I unfortunately could not find a thread to answer my question, I opened a new one.
(1) Is it possible to adjust standard errors using Huber/White standard errors and/or clustering standard errors when using a random-effects tobit panel regression model? I have tried the following code.
Error: "option vce() specified multiple times"
Error: "vcetype 'robust' not allowed"
Error: "vcetype 'cluster' not allowed"
After I concluded that it is likely not possible to use xttobit with robust and/or clustered standard errors, I tested the same code with the -tobit comand which worked.
(2) However, it still seems not possible to use both commands vce(robust) and vce(cluster firmid) together. Is it generally possible to use both commands together? Or do clustered standard errors are automatically robust? I am asking as I found in one paper that used robust Huber/White standard errors (White, 1980) AND clustered standard errors at the firm level.
Background: I have panel data on a firm-year level. I chose to use a tobit model as my y variable is censored at 0. I tried to use -xttobit instead of -tobit first as I assumed it to be generally more appropriate when having panel data.
Thanks.
Best,
Martin
I hope this finds you well!
As I unfortunately could not find a thread to answer my question, I opened a new one.
(1) Is it possible to adjust standard errors using Huber/White standard errors and/or clustering standard errors when using a random-effects tobit panel regression model? I have tried the following code.
Code:
xttobit y x, vce(robust) vce(cluster firmid)
Code:
xttobit y x, vce(robust)
Code:
xttobit y x, vce(cluster firmid)
After I concluded that it is likely not possible to use xttobit with robust and/or clustered standard errors, I tested the same code with the -tobit comand which worked.
Code:
tobit y x, vce(cluster firmid) tobit y x, vce(robust)
Background: I have panel data on a firm-year level. I chose to use a tobit model as my y variable is censored at 0. I tried to use -xttobit instead of -tobit first as I assumed it to be generally more appropriate when having panel data.
Thanks.
Best,
Martin
Comment