Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Running Hausman-Taylor estimator after multiple imputation

    Hi Statalist

    This is a question about implementing the Hausman-Taylor estimator -xthtaylor- within multiple imputation (i.e. following -mi estimate:- )

    Specifically, I have completed the preceding steps in -mi- implementation
    . mi set mlong
    . mi register imputed ...
    . mi register regular ...
    . mi impute chained ...

    However, when it comes to running
    . mi estimate: xthtaylor [dep var] [exogenous vars] [endogenous vars], endog([endogenous vars])

    The following error message appears:
    mi estimate: command not supported
    xthtaylor is not officially supported by mi estimate; see mi estimation for a list of Stata
    estimation commands that are supported by mi estimate. You can use option cmdok to allow
    estimation anyway.


    My questions are:

    1) Is -xthtaylor- not supported due to technical/computational reasons – in other words, is this something that a later version Stata may be able to support? Or are there theoretical reasons prohibiting the use of -xthtaylor- within -mi estimate-?

    2) If the option -cmdok- is used to force an estimation, are there reasons to be sceptical of the results? (i.e. is this a recommended approach?)

    Thank you very much for your help.
Working...
X