Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Dear Chhavi Tiwari,

    Please try the mu option to see if it helps; using fewer variables should also help. Finally, the command is based on Stata's gmm command, so you can use the gmm options to try to get a quicker estimation.

    Best wishes,

    Joao

    Comment


    • #32
      Dear Prof Joao Santos Silva , I am trying to use the Ivqreg2 for a model and would be willing to use a GMM based instrument, how do you think this can be modelled.
      Poverty= bo +b1POV(t-1) +b2ineq +b3Infla+b4gov_exp+e , instrument (L1.inq,L1.infla,L1.gov_exp) q(0.25 0.5. .75)

      Comment


      • #33
        Dear Hamid muili,

        I am afraid I do not understand your question. What is stopping you form estimating the model?

        Best wishes,

        Joao

        Comment


        • #34
          Dear All,

          With the usual thanks to Kit Baum, an updated version of ivqreg2 is now available in SSC; the changes are not big, but all users are encouraged to update.

          Please do let me know if you find any problems with the new version.

          Best wishes,

          Joao

          Comment


          • #35
            Dear @Joao Santos Silva are there specific commands to be used with ivqreg2 for the autocorrelation, over-identifying restrictions, and joint significance of parameters?

            Comment


            • #36
              Dear Abdul Abzhelad,

              No, there are not.

              Best wishes,

              Joao

              Comment


              • #37
                Thank you for your very prompt answer @Joao Santos Silva.
                Bests
                Abdul

                Comment


                • #38
                  Good day Joao Santos Silva,

                  I have a question for you related with instruments. As I know, the list of instruments should include all the exogenous variables (so these appear twice in the command) and therefore the number of instruments needs to be at least equal to the number of explanatory variables. What if lets say I have 6 variables and 3 of them is endogenous 3 exogenous. In instruments option if I put only exogenous ones (which is 3), number of instruments wont be equal to the number of explanatory variables. What should be the solution for such a case? Is the only solution is I have to bring some other exogenous instruments from outside of the model?

                  Thanks in advance

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Dear Mugabil Isayev,

                    Yes, in any instrumental variables estimator you need to have "external" instruments.

                    Best wishes,

                    Joao

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Dear Joao Santos Silva,

                      Thank you very much for your quick reply and clarification. My second question is: by adding lags of exogenous variables still we can satisfy "number of instruments needs to be at least equal to the number of explanatory variables" condition. Instead of adding external exogenous instruments, can I add lets say first and/or second lags of exogenous variables from my model to satisfy aforementioned condition?

                      Thank you in advance.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Dear Mugabil Isayev,

                        If those are valid instruments, then yes.

                        Best wishes,

                        Joao

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Dear Joao Santos Silva,

                          Thank you very much for your fast response. Last question I have for you. In GMM we have Hansen/Sargan test to check the validity of the instruments. Is there any test like Hansen/Sargan to check the validity of the instruments for ivqreg2? Or should I first apply gmm in order to be sure about the validity of instruments then go for ivreg2 ?

                          Thanks in advance.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Dear Mugabil Isayev,

                            The Hansen/Sargan test does not check the validity of the instruments, it is a test of over-identifying restrictions, which is something very different. Anyway, it can be performed in this context, although the command does not provide that result.

                            Best wishes,

                            Joao

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Dear Mugabil Isayev,

                              The Hansen/Sargan test does not check the validity of the instruments, it is a test of over-identifying restrictions, which is something very different. Anyway, it can be performed in this context, although the command does not provide that result.

                              Best wishes,

                              Joao

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Dear Joao Santos Silva,

                                I am using IVQREG2 to estimate structural quantiles but I always get this message:

                                Code:
                                convergence not achieved
                                    The Gauss-Newton stopping criterion has been met but missing standard errors indicate some of the parameters are not identified.
                                Do you know what could be causing it?

                                Thank you.

                                Best,
                                Joana

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X