Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Hi, Nicu, I think you can give it a try, and consider small sample correction (xtdcce2/xtcd2) if possible.
    Ho-Chuan (River) Huang
    Stata 19.0, MP(4)

    Comment


    • #17
      I have panel data withT=5 and N=607 based on the Hausman test my model is fixed but my data is also suffering from cross-sectional dependence according to Pesaran cd test, I also checked through Friedman but this test is showing no cross-section dependence then I did frees test that shows the presence of cross-sectional dependence so first on what test I should rely and if I assume that the problem of cross-sectional dependence than what test should I use to manage cross-sectional dependence at the same time my model is suffering from AR1 and GroupWise hetro found from xttest3.

      Comment


      • #18
        is there any command in Stata to check that whether the autocorrelation is general or panel specific moreover how to check that whether my data is suffering from moving average correlation.

        Comment


        • #19
          Mirza:
          I would probably go -xtreg- with clustered standard errors.
          Kind regards,
          Carlo
          (Stata 19.0)

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Carlo Lazzaro View Post
            Mirza:
            I would probably go -xtreg- with clustered standard errors.
            But as per my case xtreg cluster or robust option don't remove the cross sectional dependence how I would justify and if I use xtscc then accordingbto the author we first need to confirm that wherher fixed effect model is still applicable or not he suggested pannel robust hausman to run again so I am unable to run in the stata to assess that what is my suggested model and last thing I also have dummy variable it is also ommited when I run fixed effect any suggestions how to run dummy variable with fixed effects

            Comment


            • #21
              Mirza:
              it's strange that with a N>T panel dataset (where N is remakably larger than T) cross-sectional dependence can bite that hard.
              Moreover, the test you performed are sensible for T>N panel datasets: hence, I would first check whether the p-values you got from them are trustworthy when the N dimension is dominant.
              As far as the easier question is concerned, there's nothing we can gainst the -fe- machinery: time-invariant predictors will be wiped out.
              Kind regards,
              Carlo
              (Stata 19.0)

              Comment

              Working...
              X