Dear Statalist members,
I want to examine a moderation effect of gender on the relationship between openess to experience resp. agreeableness and risk taking. Gender is a dummy called female (with 1 "female"). In my Stata seminar, we were taught to analyse an interaction effect through split sample regressions. Therefore, I conducted a regression for the whole sample, a regression for female only and a regression for male only:
Can I say that gender is a moderator? And if yes, does gender weaken or strengthen the relationship between openess to experience resp. agreeableness and risk taking?
Thank you so much!
I want to examine a moderation effect of gender on the relationship between openess to experience resp. agreeableness and risk taking. Gender is a dummy called female (with 1 "female"). In my Stata seminar, we were taught to analyse an interaction effect through split sample regressions. Therefore, I conducted a regression for the whole sample, a regression for female only and a regression for male only:
Now I don't know how to interpret the outcomes below:
*Overall sample:
reg riskabovemean ope agr, robust
*For men (female=0):
reg riskabovemean ope agr if female==0, robust
*For women (female=1):
reg riskabovemean ope agr if female==1, robust
riskabovemean | overall sample | sex=0 („male“) | sex=1 („female“) | |||
Coef. | P>|t| | Coef. | P>|t| | Coef. | P>|t| | |
Openess | 0.0598968 | 0.000 | 0.0698625 | 0.000 | 0.0390326 | 0.017 |
Agreeableness | 0.0450676 | 0.000 | 0.0550326 | 0.000 | 0.0359563 | 0.025 |
Thank you so much!
Comment