Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Moderation / Interaction Effect with Split Sample Comparison

    Dear Statalist members,

    I want to examine a moderation effect of gender on the relationship between openess to experience resp. agreeableness and risk taking. Gender is a dummy called female (with 1 "female"). In my Stata seminar, we were taught to analyse an interaction effect through split sample regressions. Therefore, I conducted a regression for the whole sample, a regression for female only and a regression for male only:

    *Overall sample:
    reg riskabovemean ope agr, robust

    *For men (female=0):
    reg riskabovemean ope agr if female==0, robust

    *For women (female=1):
    reg riskabovemean ope agr if female==1, robust
    Now I don't know how to interpret the outcomes below:
    riskabovemean overall sample sex=0 („male“) sex=1 („female“)
    Coef. P>|t| Coef. P>|t| Coef. P>|t|
    Openess 0.0598968 0.000 0.0698625 0.000 0.0390326 0.017
    Agreeableness 0.0450676 0.000 0.0550326 0.000 0.0359563 0.025
    Can I say that gender is a moderator? And if yes, does gender weaken or strengthen the relationship between openess to experience resp. agreeableness and risk taking?

    Thank you so much!

  • #2
    Hello Julia. If you include the female*ope and female*agr interactions, you'll get the comparisons you want in a single model. Try this:

    Code:
    regress riskabovemean c.ope##female c.agr##female, robust
    The coefficients for the product terms will give you the differences between males and females.

    Finally, the name of your outcome variable, riskabovemean, caught my eye. A variable name like that suggests (to me) a dichotomous (Yes/No) variable. If it is a dichotomous variable, then you should be using some other type of model--e.g., logistic regression.

    HTH.
    --
    Bruce Weaver
    Email: [email protected]
    Web: http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/
    Version: Stata/MP 18.0 (Windows)

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you Bruce! Well, the method with the interaction term is also what I know from other statistical programs. I now got the following results:
      riskabovemean Coef. P>|t|
      ope 0 .0696922 0.000
      1.female -0.0633182 0.002
      female#c.ope
      1
      -0.0267155 0.172
      agr 0.0530806 0.000
      female#c.agr
      1
      -0.0151558 0.435
      So just to be sure: "female#c.ope 1" and "female'c.agr 1" give me the possible interaction effect. But as p>0.1 for both, the effects are not significant and thus gender is not a moderator?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re #3: Right.
        --
        Bruce Weaver
        Email: [email protected]
        Web: http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/
        Version: Stata/MP 18.0 (Windows)

        Comment

        Working...
        X